Saturday, August 22, 2020

Six Point Movement in Bangladesh free essay sample

After the declaration of 6 focuses by Sheik Mujibur Rahman in 1966, the then Bhashani NAP, genius China Communist gatherings and Chhatra Union (Menon Group) were the first to explain their response. They guaranteed that the 6 focuses were in reality the formation of American knowledge organization, CIA. Its point was to create affinity with the USA by making issues for Ayub Khan. Be that as it may, such a clarification on the inception of 6 focuses was not acknowledged or demonstrated by anybody later. A few people opine that the 6 focuses were in certainty the making of some Bangali CSP officials †Ruhul Quddus, Shamsur Rahman Khan, Ahmed Fazlur Rahman. A fragment of the individuals are of the view that the 6 focuses were the joint creation of erudite people including the financial matters educator of Dhaka University. Close by this, another quarter accepts that the 6 focuses were set up by a gathering of liberal government officials of India. There was another fragment who used to guarantee that Ayub Khan utilized his preferred civil servant Altaf Gauhar to set up the record and afterward gave that over to Khairul Kabir (the then General Manager of Krishi Bank). We will compose a custom paper test on Six Point Movement in Bangladesh or on the other hand any comparable point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page His objective was to inspire political profits. As a result of these opposing cases and opposite perspectives in regards to the drafting of 6 focuses, its birthplace despite everything stays muddled and covered in riddle. The 6 focuses 1. The constitution ought to accommodate a Federation of Pakistan in its actual sense dependent on the Lahore Resolution and the parliamentary type of government with matchless quality of a Legislature legitimately chose based on general grown-up establishment. 2. The national government should manage just two subjects: Defense and Foreign Affairs, and all other remaining subjects ought to be vested in the combining states. . Two isolated, yet uninhibitedly convertible monetary forms for two wings ought to be presented; or if this isn't attainable, there ought to be one money for the entire nation, yet successful sacred arrangements ought to be acquainted with prevent the trip of capital from East to West Pakistan. Moreover, a different Banking Reserve ought to be built up and separate financial and money related arrangement be received for East Pakistan. 4. The intensity of tax assessment and income assortment ought to be vested in the combining units and the government place would have no such force. The organization would be qualified for an offer in the state charges to meet its uses. 5. There ought to be two separate records for the outside trade income of the two wings; the remote trade necessities of the government ought to be met by the two wings similarly or in a proportion to be fixed; indigenous items should move liberated from obligation between the two wings, and the constitution ought to enable the units to build up exchange joins with outside nations. 6. East Pakistan ought to have a different state army or paramilitary power. Six-point Program a contract of requests articulated by the A for expelling dissimilarity between the two wings of Pakistan and finish the inward frontier rule of West Pakistan in East Bengal. The Indo-Pak War of 1965 finished with the execution of Taskent Treaty. To the old complaints of monetary difference included the grumble of carelessness and lack of interest of focal government towards the safeguard of East Pakistan. Bangabandhu  was vocal on this issue. The pioneers of the resistance groups of West Pakistan gathered a national show at Lahore on 6 February 1966 so as to find out the post-Taskent political pattern. Bangabandhu arrived at Lahore on 4 February alongside the top chiefs of Awami League, and the day tailing he put the Six-point Charter of interest before the subject panel as the requests of the individuals of East Pakistan. He made strain to remember his proposition for the motivation of the gathering. They dismissed the proposition of Bangabandhu. On the next day the papers of West Pakistan distributed reports on the Six-point program, and Sheik Mujibur Rahman was anticipated as a rebel. Thus Sheik Mujib relinquished the meeting. The Six-point program alongside a proposition of development for the acknowledgment of the requests was put before the gathering of the working board of Awami League on 21 February 1966, and the proposition was completed consistently. A booklet on the Six-point Program with presentation from Bangabandhu Sheik Mujib and Tajuddin Ahmad was distributed. Another booklet entitled Amader Banchar Dabi : 6-dafa Karmasuchi (Our requests for presence : 6-focuses Program) was distributed for the sake of Sheik Mujibur Rahman, and was circulated in the chamber meeting of Awami League hung on 18 March 1966. Six focuses 1. The constitution ought to accommodate a Federation of Pakistan in its actual sense on the Lahore Resolution and the parliamentary type of government with matchless quality of a Legislature straightforwardly chose based on all inclusive grown-up establishment. 2. The government should manage just two subjects : Defense and Foreign Affairs, and all other residuary subjects will be vested in the combining states. 3. Two isolated, yet uninhibitedly convertible monetary standards for two wings ought to be presented ; or if this isn't achievable, there ought to be one money for the entire nation, however successful sacred arrangements ought to be acquainted with prevent the trip of capital from East to West Pakistan. Moreover, a different Banking Reserve ought to be built up and separate financial and money related approach be received for East Pakistan. 4. The intensity of tax collection and income assortment will be vested in the combining units and the government community will have no such force. The organization will be qualified for an offer in the state expenses to meet its consumptions. 5. There ought to be two separate records for the outside trade income of the two wings ; the remote trade necessities of the government ought to be met by the two wings similarly or in a proportion to be fixed; indigenous items should move liberated from obligation between the two wings, and the constitution ought to engage the units to build up exchange joins with outside nations. . East Pakistan ought to have a different local army or paramilitary power. The restriction heads of West Pakistan took a gander at Mujibs Six-direct Program as a gadget toward disband Pakistan, and thus they through and through dismissed his proposition. The Ayub government captured him and put him being investigated what is known as AGARTALA CONSPIRACY CASE. The cas e prompted broad tumult in East Pakistan coming full circle in the mass uprising of mid 1969. Under open tension, government had to discharge him unequivocally on 22 February 1969. The Awami League looked for open command for the six point program in the general appointment of 1970 in which Mujib got the total order from the individuals of East Pakistan for his six point. Be that as it may, Zulfiqar Ali Bhuttu would not join the meeting of the National Assembly planned to be hung on 3 March 1971 except if a settlement was reached between the two heads in advance. Sheik Mujibur Rahman and his gathering sat in an extended exchange from 15 March 1971. The exchange neglected to create any positive outcome. The military crackdown of 25 March fixed the destiny of the six point including the destiny of Pakistan. [Ashfaq Hossain] The Significance of the Six-Point Movement and its Impact on Bangladesh’s Struggle for Freedom and Self-assurance Introduction: The noteworthy Six-Point development in 1966 was the defining moment in Bangladesh’s journey for more prominent self-sufficiency and self-assurance from Pakistan’s frontier control. The six-point request has been broadly credited as the ‘charter of freedom’ in the historical backdrop of Bangladesh’s battle for opportunity and autonomy. The six-point plan had conceived, in addition to other things, an out and out bureaucratic type of Government dependent on the 1940 Lahore Resolution, a parliamentary arrangement of government straightforwardly chose by the individuals based on grown-up establishment, two separate monetary forms or two hold banks for the two wings of Pakistan, and a para-military power for East Pakistan. The stupendous accomplishment of the six-point development in 1966 had provoked the decision circle of Pakistan to dishonor the coordinators of this development. Despite the fact that Ayub Khan’s detestable system had utilized different merciless reformatory measures against the defenders, coordinators and supporters of the six-point equation, this notable development had genuinely affected and adapted the resulting political improvement in Pakistan. The fundamental reason for this paper is to evaluate the criticalness of the six-point development and its effect on Bangladesh’s battle for opportunity and self-assurance. When the principle substance of the six-point plan are summed up, the nature, extent, and effect of the six-point development will be assessed. Planned for proving and approving my own perceptions about the extent and effect of the six-point development, some academic perceptions will be refered to. At long last, some finishing up comments will be made. The Six-Point Plan: the Main Elements Sheik Mujibur Rhaman, the then General Secretary of the East Pakistan Awami League (EPAL), had by and by presented the six-guide program toward the topic panel of the All-Party Meeting of the resistance ideological groups of the then Pakistan in Lahore on February 5, 1966. In view of his â€Å"6-Point Formula: Our Right to Live† [March 23, 1966], the central requests and topics of the noteworthy six-point plan are being summed up as follows: Point 1: â€Å"The Constitution ought to accommodate a Federation of Pakistan in its actual sense based on [1940] Lahore Resolution, and Parliamentary type of Government with matchless quality of lawmaking body straightforwardly chose based on general grown-up establishment. † Point 2: The Federal Gover

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.